Sunday, 29 May 2016

Controversial Theories of Child Discipline

Traditional versus Western models of child discipline:

Although the use of traditional or corporal punishment to discipline children has been argued for centuries, a thorough understanding of whether and how corporal punishment affects children has not been reached. There are many models of child discipline but lets talk about these three:

Traditional, Western and Biblical Models.  


  1. Traditional Child Discipline. There is an old African saying that "It takes a village to raise a child". If my child breaks the rules, uncles, aunties or the elders of the village are legally and morally allowed to discipline them. In my experience this has effectively worked for my generation because there have been limited adverse issues of crime and immorality compared to my children's generation who are growing in the western culture. Traditional models bring wholesome fear and maturity. This is the fear with a positive quality that ultimately enriches and nourishes our lives, it could be argued. The above video reflects the controversy between western and traditional ways of child discipline where some immigrant parents struggle to adapt to the western culture, which in this case has reflected flaws. The children's services remove the child from parents and dismally fail the child whose case got worse as she got pregnant and abused while under social services care. Furthermore, parents ended up carrying the can to help the depressed teen mother and the social services are no longer to help the child as intended. Could these be some of the failed policies of the western child discipline approaches?


                2.  The western culture believes that discipline is the process of teaching children the values and normative behaviours of their society. It is the guidance of children’s moral, emotional and physical development, enabling them to take responsibility for themselves when they are older. It helps children become aware of the boundaries of what is acceptable and unacceptable behaviour, what is right and wrong, and how to relate to the world around them. Discipline emphasizes teaching and the consequences of actions. Positive discipline normally involves helping children to understand why certain behaviours are unacceptable and other behaviours are acceptable. In this view parents are authoritative guides and supporters on the path to maturity, not generals commanding the course of growth by using corporal punishment. Examples encouraged includes: time out, talking, removal of regular incentives, cafew, limiting bad associations, "Bad company corrupts good character" (1 Corinthians 15:33).

3. Biblical Child Discipline: Removing biblical prayer in schools has increased social problems in our societies.
The removal of bible prayer in public schools by the supreme court in USA had negative moral impact in today's societies. My argument is that prayer would not eliminate criminal problems but at least it would reduce them. For example in June 25, 1962, the United States Supreme Court decided in Engelv. Vitale that a prayer approved by the New York Board of Regents for use in schools violated the First Amendment because it represented establishment of religion. In contrast,  in 1963, in Abington School District v. Schempp, the court decided against Bible readings in public schools along the same lines. So we need to realize that these actions do have consequences, when we remove that moral fiber - that moral emphasis – this is what can result.

• Academic achievement plummetes
• Increased rate of out-of-wedlock births
• Increase in illegal drug use
• Increase in juvenile crime
• Deterioration of school behavior



1 comment:

  1. Three major models explored: Traditional, Western and Biblical: Lets talk.

    ReplyDelete